Classic Plus archive: older content may reflect the period before Forever was announced. Find current facts, classes and zones in the new codex. Explore WoW Forever →
Back to the signal desk

MULTILINGUAL EXPANSION ROADMAP

LIVE · TWO PRIORITIES PER BROWSER

The Language Gate

English and German form the launch archive. Compare the official WoW language communities, inspect the quality gate for every future edition, and choose the two realms we should validate next.

THE LANGUAGE GATE

Which realm should open after English and German?

A source-backed expansion plan for a multilingual Classic+ archive. Choose up to two editions worth building properly—not seven machine-translated mirrors.

English + GermanEditorial recommendation: French + Spanish first

7

candidate editions

2

Choose up to two

0

saved ballots

0

language selections

Live foundation

English + German

Every core dossier, guide, evidence label, and correction workflow launches in both languages.

Next expedition

Editorial recommendation: French + Spanish first

Both have official Blizzard language support and dedicated forums. Spanish must keep European and Latin American variants explicit.

Next expedition

Best candidates for the first expansion once a native terminology reviewer and repeat readership are secured.

French

Français

fr

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Blizzard lists French as a supported WoW language and maintains a dedicated forum with a Classic section.

Launch gate

A native editor must review established spell, class, zone, and lore terminology before indexing any French page.

Spanish

Español

es-ESes-419

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Blizzard lists both European and Latin American Spanish and maintains a dedicated European forum with a Classic community.

Launch gate

The portal must choose and label regional variants instead of silently mixing EU and Latin American terminology.

Watch camp

Officially supported communities worth measuring before a full archive is promised.

Brazilian Portuguese

Português (Brasil)

pt-BR

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Brazilian Portuguese is listed as a supported game language, and Blizzard hosts a Portuguese community forum with Classic threads.

Launch gate

Brazilian and European Portuguese expectations must be scoped explicitly before a translation workflow begins.

Italian

Italiano

it

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Italian is an official WoW language with a dedicated Blizzard forum and visible Classic community threads.

Launch gate

A native terminology owner and repeat readership signal are required before maintaining a full archive.

Separate realm plan

Regional editions that need their own sources, moderation, publishing habits, and operations.

Russian

Русский

ru

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Russian is an official WoW language with a dedicated Blizzard forum and a substantial Classic discussion section.

Launch gate

A separate native moderation, sourcing, and operational plan is required; an automated mirror would not be responsible.

Korean

한국어

ko

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Korean is an official regional WoW language with its own Blizzard forum and publishing ecosystem.

Launch gate

Regional sources, native editorial review, platform habits, and time-zone operations need a dedicated launch plan.

Traditional Chinese

繁體中文

zh-Hant-TW

Why it belongs on the roadmap

Traditional Chinese is listed for Taiwan and has a dedicated regional Blizzard forum.

Launch gate

The Taiwan source ecosystem and native terminology require a separately staffed edition, not a machine-translated copy.

Community language signal

The current leaders stay hidden until you decide, reducing bandwagon pressure on the first choice.

Save your ballot to reveal the signal

Updated: Awaiting first ballot

Anonymous by design

No name, email, account, comment, or IP address is attached to a ballot. The random key is persisted only in this browser, sent solely to derive a one-way hash, and never stored in raw form.

A priority signal—not a market survey

A new browser can vote again. Results therefore guide editorial validation only; they do not prove unique users, market size, Blizzard plans, or a launch date.

No shallow machine-translation archive

AI may draft translation, but native terminology review, source verification, hreflang, correction ownership, and an editor responsible for that edition are mandatory before indexing.